Disclaimer: This site contains the Personal Opinions of Canadian Citizens.
All Claims being Tested in Court. Everything is for Edutainment Purposes only.
Chapters & Evidence
(Slide Deck): https://Justice4EIMisconduct.com/assets/(Presentations)/J4EIM-IVIM-2512.pdf
Part #1: Case Summary (30 min) – About the J4EIM Project & Employment Insurance (2025-12-11)
(§1.1) [00:00]: J4EIM: About the Project – Justice 4 EI Misconduct (Our Case, People & Goals)
A brief Introduction to J4EIM: Who we are, how we got here, what we want & where we are going.
J4EIM Home Page: https://Justice4EIMisconduct.com
Court Files & Presentations: https://blog.justice4eimisconduct.com/p/resources
Press Releases: https://blog.justice4eimisconduct.com/p/press-releases
Podcast: https://blog.justice4eimisconduct.com/podcast
YT Channel: https://youtube.com/@Justice4EIMisconduct
(§1.2) [5:07]: Case Summary: Fundamental Premises Underlying the COVID-19 Pandemic & Immunisation Mandates
A short Summary that examines What Happened during the Pandemic – and How Everyone Responded to the Emergency.
Big Idea: Companies granted themselves the right to break the law, merely by issuing corporate policy saying so. (Policy over the Law)
YT: https://youtu.be/sxNnpCribyg
(§1.3) [9:38]: Key Questions: Short List of Major Problems that Broke the Rule of Law & Violated the Integrity of our EI Program
Points at Issue: Our List of Key Legal Questions underlying our Case that we are asking the Court to Answer for all Canadians.
(§1.4) [12:43]: Root Cause Analysis: How did Employment Canada Orchestrate this $13B Scandal & How did it Survive this long? (5+ Years)
How did ESDC Engineer & Execute their ‘COVID-19 Mandate Misconduct’ (C19-MM) Program? How did they ‘get away’ with it [so far]?
Root Cause Analysis: (Time: @18:15 min)
https://blog.Justice4EIMisconduct.com/p/case-summary-video?timestamp=1095
YT: https://youtu.be/sxNnpCribyg?t=1095s
(§1.5) [16:54]: Process Engineering: How were the EI Benefits Decision-Making Processes Changed Across Multiple ESDC Agencies?
A brief look at the EI Benefits Adjudication Process, examining how it was changed at critical points throughout the Case History.
J4EIM Resources: Problem Summaries:
https://blog.Justice4EIMisconduct.com/i/168756515/short-form-summary-case-explanation
(§1.6) [21:26]: Impact of C19-MM Scandal: How Many Lives were Destroyed? How Much Money was Denied to Lawful Claimants?
A short Summary of EI & SST Statistics, to quantify the Impact & Damage this Scandal caused to Innocent Canadians.
Big Idea: [E.I.] 1M+ Extra EI Denials, 65% More Often. [SST] C19 Mandates Doubled the SST Case Load. 37%+ of All Cases were Denied for ‘Mandate Misconduct’. (We are Not a ‘Fringe Minority’ [with ‘Unacceptable Views’])
YT: https://youtu.be/uTuuFo7QH34
Lex Acker: Financial Analysis (SubStack Post)
(§1.7) [25:08]: ESDC ‘Solution’: Considering How Big Their ‘Problem’ Was (400K+ Claimants, $12B+ Liability), How Did They Avoid EI Collapse?
Big Idea: Long-Settled EI Adjudication Processes were ‘Engineered’ & EI ADMs were Incentivised & Coerced to Break the EI Act.
How? The EI Act was Overridden by a Secret ‘BE-Memo’ [2021-10] and Decision Templates that Miscited Case Law & ‘Abused Processes’ using Pre-Written Reasons + a Modified ‘Misconduct Test’ containing two Logical Fallacies.
J4EIM Resources: Problem Summaries:
https://blog.Justice4EIMisconduct.com/i/168756515/short-form-summary-case-explanation
(§1.8) [27:38]: Censorship Attempts: Once Our Evidence & Arguments were Submitted, Someone Tried to Silence Us using a [Cancelled] Confidentiality Order
Big Idea: When ‘Considered In-Full’, the Evidence & Arguments we present Somehow Threatens People in Power – [some] who are willing to Break the Rules to Silence Us.
J4EIM Podcast: Chapter 1 (Time: @7:44 min)
https://blog.justice4eimisconduct.com/p/j4eim-s4t-ei-part-1?timestamp=464
YT: https://youtu.be/iRcOkqwQeYM?t=458s
Part #2: The ‘Problem’ (21 min) – Understanding the E.I. Program, its Legislation & Legal Requirements (2025-12-11)
(Slide Deck): https://Justice4EIMisconduct.com/assets/(Presentations)/J4EIM-IVIM-2512.pdf
(§2.1) [30:05]: J4EIM: Overview of J4EIM Resources
A brief Introduction to J4EIM: Our SubStack, Resources, Media & PR Materials.
Podcast: https://blog.justice4eimisconduct.com/podcast
YT Channel: https://youtube.com/@Justice4EIMisconduct
(§2.2) [31:30]: E.I. Law (Part #1): Legislative History & Intent (EI Act & DESDA). What Does the Law Require during EI Benefits Adjudication?
Looking at our Rizzo Analysis (Study of Legislative Intent & History) of the EI Act §29(c): ‘Just Cause’ Analysis
Big Idea: Completely Denying EI Claimants All Benefits (instead of Imposing Penalties) was the most Controversial Change in EI History. (It provoked widespread ‘Public Outrage’ & Required Key Amendments to ‘Protect Workers’ having ‘Just Cause’.)
YT: https://youtu.be/S-qudPv85aU
(§2.3) [40:07]: E.I. Law (Part #2): Statutory Interpretation (EI Act & DESDA). What Does the Law Require during EI Benefits Adjudication?
Looking at our Rizzo Analysis (Study of Legislative Intent & History) of the EI Act §29(c): ‘Just Cause’ Analysis
Big Idea: Just Cause Analysis (Examining whether the ‘Employer Acted Contrary to Law’ or made ‘Significant Changes’ to the Employment Contract) is Required, even in situations where the Employer Alleges Worker Misconduct.
YT: https://youtu.be/S-qudPv85aU
(§2.4) [45:52]: Legal Principles: What Factors must be Considered when Determining EI Benefits Eligibility? What was Done Prior to the Pandemic?
A Brief Summary of the various Legal Principles & Considerations involved when Adjudicating EI Benefits Claims.
YT: https://youtu.be/nPcUprZkjwY
YT: https://youtu.be/1cuLew1n6pc
Part #3: Their ‘Solution’ [53 min (23+20)] – How EI Processes were Engineered to Mass-Deny Claims (2025-12-18)
(Slide Deck): https://Justice4EIMisconduct.com/assets/(Presentations)/J4EIM-IVIM-2512.pdf
Podcast: https://blog.justice4eimisconduct.com/podcast
YT Channel: https://youtube.com/@Justice4EIMisconduct
(§3.1) [50:26]: EI Benefits Adjudication: The Complete Process from End-to-End
A Look at the EI Benefits Application Process from Beginning to End (from: Employment Separation to Appellate Judicial Review [FCA])
Big Idea: [Some] Senior Leadership at Employment Canada had to Engineer every Step in the EI Process to Prevent Complete Program Collapse
SST: EI Appeal Process: https://sst-tss.gc.ca/en/your-appeal/employment-insurance-appeal-process-glance
(§3.2) [51:34]: Records of Employment (ROEs): Legislation & Guidance from Employment Canada (ESDC)
An Overview of Official Laws & Rules about Records of Employment (Including Mandate-Specific Instructions)
Big Idea: It is a Criminal Offence to Knowingly, Intentionally Miscode ROEs, the Only Sworn Evidence (at: Service Canada & EI Commission)
YT: https://youtu.be/cE0W0c0OMBA
Criminal Code §398: Falsifying Employment Records:
https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-46/section-398.html
[ESDC] ROE Guide (Box 16 & 22):
https://canada.ca/en/employment-social-development/programs/ei/ei-list/reports/roe-guide.html
[ESDC] ROEs During COVID-19 (Archive):
https://web.archive.org/web/20241126215225/https:/www.canada.ca/en/employment-social-development/programs/ei/ei-list/ei-employers.html#h2.02
(§3.3) [58:12]: BE-Memo (2021-10): ‘EI Eligibility & Refusal to Comply with Mandatory Vaccination Policy’
Examination of the Discriminatory BE-Memo [2021-10] that coerced EI Decision-Makers (ADMs) to Break the EI Act
Big Idea: Service Canada & EI Commission ADMs were Coerced to Break the Law by a Secret Policy Memo that Only Applied to C19-MM Claims. (Vaccine Mandate Cases)
BE-Memo [2021-10]: (Memo: SC & CEIC)
https://Justice4EIMisconduct.com/assets/5-BEMemo/EI-OPSD-BEMemo.pdf
Lex Acker: Evidence (ATIPs & Affidavit)
https://Justice4EIMisconduct.com/assets/5-BEMemo/Lex-Acker-Affidavit.pdf
Lex Acker: (SubStack Post Explaining BE-Memo ATIP Process)
J4EIM Podcast: Chapter 4: (Time: @7:57 min)
https://blog.Justice4EIMisconduct.com/p/j4eim-s4t-ei-part-4?timestamp=477
YT: https://youtu.be/uTuuFo7QH34?t=477s
(§3.4) [1:02:24]: Changing Facts: How the EI Commission Avoided Losing Their Case at the Tribunal (SST)
The CEIC Changed Facts in Their Case, Claiming that Their Own Prior Decisions were ‘Clerical Errors’.
Big Idea: Changing Facts is Potentially a Sanctionable Offence in Legal Proceedings.
J4EIM Podcast: Chapter 9: (Time: @6:44 min)
https://blog.justice4eimisconduct.com/p/j4eim-s4t-ei-part-9?timestamp=404
YT: https://youtu.be/cE0W0c0OMBA?t=404s
(§3.5) [1:06:50]: Atrium Decision Templates (Part #1): The Tribunal’s Internal Case Management Tools Use Pre-Written Decisions
An Overview of Atrium Decision Templates: Their History, Current Requirements & Problems They Cause Adjudicators.
Big Idea: EI Decisions are ‘Built’ using blocks of Prewritten Reasons, Case Citations & Footnotes that Direct the Outcome.
YT: https://youtu.be/pgkxO1lBSGY
(§3.6) [1:12:46]: Abuse of Process: Misusing Historical EI Cases to Override the EI Act §29(c).
A Look at How Past EI Decisions were [Mis]Cited to Justify Not Conducting Just Cause ‘Contrary to Law’ Analysis.
Big Idea: Abuse of Process is Potentially a Sanctionable Offence in Legal Proceedings.
YT: https://youtu.be/hGPKNMsTfZQ
(§3.7) [1:17:37]: Logical Fallacies: How the ‘Misconduct Test’ was Modified to Override the EI Act §29(c).
Examining how the ‘4-Part Misconduct’ was Changed with Two Logical Fallacies to Avoid ‘Contrary to Law’ Analysis
Big Idea: Our Supreme Court Holds that ‘Logical Fallacies’ are Unreasonable. (Vavilov ¶104)
YT: https://youtu.be/7WOzsknoqcM
(§3.8) [1:25:56]: Atrium Decision Templates (Part #2): How Templates are Used to ‘Reverse-Engineer Outcomes’ for EI Benefits
A Practical Examination of Contradictory Atrium Templates. (Citing the ‘KVP’ Case: re. Unilaterally Imposed Policies)
Big Idea: Our Supreme Court Holds that ‘Reverse-Engineering Outcomes’ is Unreasonable. (Vavilov ¶121)
YT: https://youtu.be/pgkxO1lBSGY
(§3.9) [1:33:40]: ‘TaxPayer’ Error: 160+ EI Denials Based on Judges’ Misunderstanding about How the EI Program is Funded
A Brief Mention of SST & FC Decisions Denying EI because the “TaxPayers Should Not Pay for an Employer’s LawBreaking.”
Big Idea: ‘Obiter Dicta’ from Erroneous Case Law about EI Funding is being Cited as Precedent to Deny Benefits.
(§3.10) [1:35:45]: Closing Thoughts (Next Steps): Public Interest Letters, Public Interviews & Parliamentary Petition
A Quick List of Easy Actions We can Take to Fix this Injustice for All Canadians. (Contact Courts & Ministers)
Big Idea: We Can Cause Change by Sharing Our Concerns about this Major EI Scandal with our Public Servants
Press Releases (PR): https://blog.Justice4EIMisconduct.com/p/press-releases
PIL: https://blog.Justice4EIMisconduct.com/p/public-interest-working-group
Resources
All Chapters: https://blog.Justice4EIMisconduct.com/podcast
J4EIM Home
Note: We know there are mistakes in the auto-generated Captions. We do plan to manually correct each episode to ensure the Transcripts match our Intentions.
Support Our Project: https://GiveSendGo.com/Justice-4-EI-Misconduct
