Resources :: Justice 4 EI Misconduct

About the J4EIM Project: Various Resources (Court Documents, Presentations, etc.)

and

Sep 30, 2025

Justice 4 EI Misconduct: Case Resources

Disclaimer: This site contains the Personal Opinions of Canadian Citizens. All Claims are being Tested in Court. Until then, everything is for Entertainment Purposes only.

Last Updated: 2025-09-29 (@2354h)

As this Case (and time) progress, we will add various Resources to this page.

Court Documents

Presentations

Long-Form: Detailed Case Explanation

This lengthy two-part series (5h) provides a comprehensive walk through our Case, giving a detailed look at the various Problems, Errors & Abuses that occurred within the EI Program during the Pandemic. (Specifically re. ‘Mandate Misconduct’ Claims)

Part #1 explains ‘The Problem’: What does the EI Act require from Decision-Makers? Complying would have meant paying out ~$13B – which would collapse the Program…

Part #2 examines ‘Their Solution’: How did Canada avoid paying this $13B? Various EI processes were ‘engineered’ across Agencies & imposed on Adjudicators via policy. Most of them did not even realise that they were breaking the law by ‘following policy’…

Stand4Thee: Episode #3 (2025-08-29)

Part 1 (S4T: Episode #3): Section #1 outlines the 15 Errors in this Case and lays out the detailed statutory foundation governing Employment Insurance adjudication.

Section #2 explores Parliamentary Hansards (Transcripts) to document the History underlying the most contentious ‘temporary’ Program change in EI History, which caused protests, riots & arrests – and provoked construction projects to ‘install back-doors’ at EI Offices across Canada.

Section #3 documents the government’s Legislative Intent about this EI Change. Cabinet Ministers, Parliamentary Secretaries & EI Directors all explained their Intentions ‘on-the-record’. They were unequivocal: The primary basis upon which Claimants could be Disentitled from EI is ‘Just Cause’ Analysis – regularly conducted before the Pandemic – but unlawfully rejected in ‘Mandate Misconduct’-related Claims.

Stand4Thee: Episode #4 (2025-09-05)

Part 2 (S4T: Episode #4): Section #1 reviews ‘Just Cause’ (from Part #1) and explores the EI Adjudication process from Employment Separation through Judicial Review in the Federal Court system.

Section #2 examines the various Problems, Errors & Abuses that were engineered at each step in the EI Adjudication process, detailing how rampant workflow injustices were designed & imposed on Decision-Makers at each stage, to ensure Benefits Denial.

Section #3 studies the ‘Atrium’ Decision Templates that permitted Adjudicators (‘TMs’) to ‘Reverse-Engineer’ desired Outcomes. When crafting their Decisions, Atrium (the SST Case-Management tool) inserts pre-written ‘templated’ Arguments, which direct the final Outcome, based on Templates with legally-conflicting Reasons. This enables ‘selection’ of the Templates necessary to always Deny EI Benefits to otherwise Qualified Claimants – even when these Reasons contradict previous Decisions from the same TMs.

Short-Form: Summary Case Explanation

This short two-part series provides a brief Summary of our Case, giving a high-level overview of the various Problems, Errors & Abuses that occurred within the EI Program during the Pandemic. (Specifically re. ‘Mandate Misconduct’ Claims)