Public Interest Working Group :: Justice 4 EI Misconduct
About the J4EIM Project: Public Interest Letters & Press-Releases
Justice 4 EI Misconduct: Public Interest Letters
Disclaimer: This site contains the Personal Opinions of Canadian Citizens. All Claims are being Tested in Court. Until then, everything is for Entertainment Purposes only.
Last Updated: 2025-09-07 @2214h
Public Interest Campaign
Interactive Letter
This is where we will build our Public Interest Letters…
https://Justice4EIMisconduct.com/assets/Public-Interest/Draft-Misconduct-Letter.docx
Recipients (Primary)
SCC: Supreme Court of Canada :: Reception@scc-csc.ca (or: Media@scc-csc.ca)
FCA: Federal Court of Appeal :: FC_Reception_CF@cas-satj.gc.ca
AG-CA: Attorney General of Canada :: Hon. Sean Fraser
MCU@Justice.gc.ca (or: WebAdmin@Justice.gc.ca)
ESDC: Minister of Employment :: Hon. Patty Hajdu
ESDC: Secretary of State (Labour) :: Hon. John Zerucelli
J4EIM: Justice 4 EI Misconduct :: Justice4EIMisconduct@outlook.com
Recipients (Optional)
Your Own Provincial Attorney General
Your Own MP (Parliament)
Controlling Case Law
The Governing Case re. Public Interest Standing is ‘CCD’ (2022 SCC 27).
2022 SCC 27: British Columbia (AG) v. Council of Canadians with Disabilities (CanLII)
Although we are not ‘applying for Standing’ this Case sets out the Test for ‘Public Interest’. Our Letter should target this (‘CCD’), specifically showing how our Case:
Contains: (a) Serious Justiciable Issue
In which we all possess: (b) Genuine Interest [and]
This Case is: (c) Reasonable & Effective Means (to Obtain Justice)
Specific Paragraphs: ¶1, ¶22, ¶29-30, ¶33-35, ¶38, ¶44-46, ¶48-50, ¶52-55
Specific Contents
List Errors & Highlight Injustice (Abuse of Process & Logically-Fallacious ‘Test’; Secret BE-Memo; Atrium Decision Templates: Reverse-Engineering Decisions [Legally-Conflicting Reasons]; Censorship Attempt; CEIC Changing Facts; etc.)
Questions at Issue (e.g. #3: Employers Granting themselves the Right to Break the Law)
Importance of Rule of Law, Truth, Justice & ‘Right-to-be Heard’
Human Cost of Injustice (re. SST Stats: Efficiency & Monetary Costs: Spent $Ms fighting Unjust Issue that represented $0 Public Cost [granting prepaid EI Premiums].)
Real Danger: Enshrining Injustice as ‘Precedent’
Discrimination & Procedural Fairness
Call for Transparency & Accountability
Public Interaction (Comments)
Provide your thoughts – and any #MeToo situations, specifically listing the Errors that applied in your own Cases… (Full List in Home Page)
Oh wow! I didn't realize that people, in a similar situation as I was (refusing to disclose private medical information), were targeted to be discriminated against by that internal 'Secret BE-Memo' you've exposed. This infuriating and outrageous. Good luck on your case! Expose the truth!
Thanks for your efforts!