Public Interest Letters :: Justice 4 EI Misconduct
About the J4EIM Project: Public Interest Letters
Justice 4 EI Misconduct: Public Interest Letters
Disclaimer: This site contains the Personal Opinions of Canadian Citizens. All Claims are being Tested in Court. Until then, everything is for Entertainment Purposes only.
Last Updated: 2026-02-15 @22h
Contact Info: J4EIM@outlook.com
Note: This is the most important way you can use your voice to influence change.
Note: Please contact us if you have any questions about this process. (Phone#)
Public Interest Campaign
(Video Coming)
During the pandemic, hundreds of thousands of Canadians were wrongly denied Employment Insurance (EI) Benefits under the ‘Misconduct’ label. This widespread injustice devastated livelihoods across the country – not only for workers, but for their families, partners, and communities. For many, the experience was confusing and painful, with little understanding of how or why these decisions were made.
Through this J4EIM Judicial Review, we now have answers: this court case exposes how our system failed Canadians in ways that never should have happened.
Our Public Interest Campaign gives you a way to use your power – your voice – to help secure Justice for EI Misconduct. If you were harmed or angered by what happened, this is for you. If you contribute to and rely on EI, this is for you. Even if you’ve never received EI Benefits, your voice still matters. You can help shape a fair and accountable system for everyone.
By speaking up, we can show Decision-Makers (ADMs) that Canadians know what happened, are watching closely, and expect real justice and meaningful reform. Public Interest is a crucial part of every court case, and when citizens participate, it has a profound impact on government decision‑making.
This case is significant and challenging. We are asking the Court to acknowledge that new, discriminatory EI processes were engineered across multiple agencies – sometimes in secret – that led ADMs to break the law. And they often used pre-written ‘Decision Templates’ that either ‘reverse-engineered’ outcomes or determined them in advance. This is a serious request – but it is also the truth.
Right now, the most important action Canadians can take is simple: Print & Mail your Public Interest Letters to the relevant government bodies. Each letter sends a clear, powerful message that Canadians want accountability, transparency, and Justice.
When enough voices come together, they give our institutions the courage to do what is right – not what is easy.
True Justice will only come when Canadians demand it.
Why Public Interest Letters?
Meet DA. Like many Canadians, DA was denied EI Benefits under the unjust label of ‘Misconduct’. He followed every required legal step on his own (without a lawyer) – just as many others did – but chose a different legal path by challenging the system itself. Instead of focusing on errors in his individual EI Decision, DA questioned the legality of the new, pandemic‑era decision‑making processes themselves. That challenge is now before the Federal Court of Appeal.
For the Courts to treat Public Interest submissions seriously, the Supreme Court of Canada requires proof of three things: (see: ‘CCD’: 2022 SCC 27 [¶16])
(a) That the case raises a serious and significant problem, (‘Justiciable’)
(b) That the people affected have a ‘Genuine Interest’ in the outcome, [and]
(c) That a Court ruling could meaningfully help resolve the injustice.
This is where your voice matters. Your Public Interest Letters can help demonstrate all three requirements. By sharing your expectations & experiences, while standing together with others across Canada, you help show the Court why this case demands fair and thorough treatment – for every EI Claimant – and why Justice must be done.
Engineered injustices must never be permitted to become precedent.
Public Interest Letters (Instructions)
Please follow these instructions to use your voice by sending your Public Interest Letters to the relevant government entities. This process should take about one hour. (+$8.50 for a ‘6 Stamp Booklet’. Envelopes are cheaper on Amazon than at Canada Post.)
Step 1: Download the Templates
Step 2: Customise Your Letters (Optional)
Step 3: Print & Fill-In Your Letters
Step 4: Tell Your Own Story (Optional)
Step 5: Verify, Sign & Mail Them
Step 6: Send Copies by Email (Optional)
Step 8: Visit Your MP (Optional)
Step 9: Share this with Others
Step 1: Download the Templates
To make sure your voice reaches the people who can create real change, you’ll need to send them Public Interest Letters. They tell officials that you believe what happened was unfair or unlawful, and that Canadians want the system fixed. And don’t worry – you don’t have to start from scratch. We’ve prepared ready‑to‑use templates that you can personalize with your own experience and details.
(Click Here to download all Public Interest Letters & Templates):
https://Justice4EIMisconduct.com/assets/Public-Interest/(Public-Interest-Letters).zip
Document Name Word PDF
Step 2: Customise Your Letters (Optional)
You can also personalize each Word Template (before printing) to make your letters even more impactful. Use clear, simple language and add your own voice. Think about who each letter is going to, and tell that recipient exactly what you want them to understand about your own experience and why this issue matters to you.
Please Be Respectful. None of these Recipients were responsible for this Scandal…
(You can also fill-in your Name & Address on each letter to avoid writing them by hand later.)
Public Interest Letters: (5) Templates = (9) Recipients (+Personal Impact Letter)
(#1-2) Appellate Courts: FCA + SCC (2 Identical Copies)
Federal Court of Appeal: This is the Court currently deciding our Case.
Supreme Court of Canada: Supervisory Court – where we would Appeal.
(#3-4) Justice Canada: A.G. + Litigation Director (2 Copies)
Attorney General: Who is currently defending the Government’s Actions.
Director of Litigation: Person responsible for managing Federal Cases.
(#5-7) Employment Canada: Minister + Secretary + Ombuds (3 Copies)
Minister of Jobs: Cabinet Minister responsible for Employment Canada.
Secretary of Labour: Privy Council Secretary responsible for ESDC & SC.
ESDC Ombudsperson: Complaint Management & Dispute Mediation.
(#8) Members of Parliament: Federal Representatives (1+ Copy)
Your MP (Any Party): Member of Parliament for your own federal Constituency.
Ask your MP to Investigate this & amend Legislation to prevent this again.
Nearby MP (CPC): Nearest Conservative MP if you have a Liberal or NDP MP.
The CPC Caucus is waiting for paper copies of this Letter. They need to prove
widespread support to justify taking specific actions re. this Scandal…(#9) Justice 4 EI Misconduct: Us (1 Copy)
J4EIM: Allows us to prove how many Interest Letters were Mailed. (Without ATIPs)
Personal Impact Statement: Also Denied for ‘EI Misconduct’ (1 Copy per Letter)
Your Own Statement: Register your own details if you were also impacted by this.
Identical Copies attached to each Public Interest Letter. (Default of 9 Copies)Note: You can still be impacted by someone else’s Denial. (Family Member / Partner)
(e.g. You were forced to sell possessions to pay for a lawyer to help with an EI Case.)
(e.g. The bank foreclosed on the family home because your spouse was Denied EI.)
(e.g. A family member was vaccine-injured because of the immunisation mandates.)(Personalised Template Letter: For Detailed Customisation)
Baseline Template: For those who want to completely customise their Letters.
Step 3: Print & Fill-In Your Letters
Print out the appropriate number of each Letter. (See List at: Step 2)
Fill in the Date + Your Contact Information (Page #1: Top-Left)
Note: You may leave out your Street Address on our Letter [only] for privacy reasons.
If possible, please give us your City & Postal Code so we can track important metrics.
Print Your Name + Sign Your Signature (Page #2: Middle)
Note: Your Signature is the most important part of this Letter.
Note: Sign using a coloured pen. (This helps prove it’s original.)
Mark Two Options: (a) #MeToo + (b) Attachment (Page #2: Middle)
a) Indicate whether Your Own EI Case was also impacted by this ‘process engineering’.
(It is vital that every recipient documents whether you were also impacted by this Scandal.)
b) Choose ‘See Attachment’ If you are including your own Personal Impact Statement.
(It is important that you put your own Testimony into the Record of this Case. Added together, they will all become invaluable if we need to Appeal this to the Supreme Court later this year…
The Supreme Court requires every potential Appeal to meet a ‘National Public Importance’ standard before they will grant permission to file the Appeal. [see: SCA §40])
Specify MP If Applicable (Page #2: Bottom)
Mark whether any MPs also received this Letter: Name MP + Riding if not your own.
Step 4: Tell Your Own Story (Optional)
Print the number of Personal Impact Letters you need – one for each Recipient.
(9x Default: 2x Courts + 2x Justice Canada + 3x Employment Canada + 1x MP + Us)
Download: (Word Template) (Printed PDF)
Note: They are all identical, so it’s faster to fill-in the Word Template before printing.
This Template has two pages: you can use either one or both of them to tell your story.
Part 1: Lists the 14 Common Errors that were engineered throughout this scandal.
Demonstrates the widespread impact of each of the legal, process & fairness errors.
Part 2: Gives you space to write your own story. Use this section to make sure the officials understand the human cost of what happened to you – and your own family.
If you were also Denied EI: Make sure your story is told too. Mark which errors also applied in your Case. Tell the government how widespread these serious errors were…
This is important: Your evidence proves that these errors were not unique to our case.
You can also write your own SST & Court Case numbers at the bottom of each page.
A Personal Impact Statement lets you explain how an unjust EI Denial affected you.
Note: You can still be impacted by someone else’s Denial. (Family Member / Partner)
(e.g. You were forced to sell possessions to pay for a lawyer to help with their EI Case.)
(e.g. The bank foreclosed on the family home because your spouse was Denied EI.)
(e.g. A family member was vaccine-injured because of the immunisation mandates.)
Step 5: Verify, Sign & Mail Them
(List of Mailing Addresses Below)
Check Everything: Make sure each letter is filled-in correctly. (All blanks completed.)
Sign Each Letter: Ensure you put your Signature on every Letter. (Using a coloured pen.)
Label the Envelopes: Write the correct mailing & return addresses on each envelope.
(Note: You can leave your street address off the copy you send to us if privacy is a concern.)
Stuff the Envelopes: Make sure each recipient’s Letter goes into the right envelope.
Buy Stamps at Canada Post: You need stamps for the Letters not going to Parliament.
(5x Default: 2x: Courts + 1x: DOJ [Litigation Director] + 1x: ESDC [Ombuds] + Us [J4IEM])
(It’s cheaper to buy a ‘Booklet of 6’ than pay for individual stamps. Group discounts available.)
Mail Your Letters: Bring them to a Canada Post Office, Outlet, or Drop‑Box.
(List of Mailing Addresses Below)
Step 6: Send Copies by Email (Optional)
Sending a physical letter through Canada Post is the only way to make sure your voice counts. When a government Agency receives a citizen’s paper letter, it is legally required to register it and file your submission as part of the public record. This ensures that your concerns are formally recognised and will not be ignored or overlooked.
You’re welcome to email digital copies of your Letters as well. However, email is optional and does not replace the impact or legal weight of sending a physical copy.
Note: You can also call each Recipient and [or] tag them on social media. They are also required to publicly document any formal requests made by Canadian Citizens. (These actions are more impactful than basic emails that do not contain Public Interest Letters.)
The electronic contact information for each Recipient is listed below…
(Note: To ensure your contribution is properly included in this Case, you must mail your Letters through Canada Post. Every mailed letter strengthens public accountability and helps move this Case forward for all Canadians.)
Step 7: Let Us Know You Acted
When you mail your Public Interest Letters, please send a copy to our PO Box too.
This step allows us to accurately track how many Canadians have taken part in this Campaign, which is essential for demonstrating the scale of Public Concern. Your Letter to us becomes part of the documented evidence showing how many people stood together to demand accountability.
Collecting paper copies of these Letters helps us:
• Confirm participation numbers in a verifiable way
• Show decision‑makers the real‑world impact of this issue
• Bring physical boxes to our Hearing as a powerful visual reminder of our voices
We also truly value the personal notes many of you include. Your experiences and words of encouragement matter – they remind us why this work is so important.
We do not need your full street address on this letter or envelope. Providing only your city & postal code is enough. This helps us create anonymized participation maps and riding‑level statistics, which strengthen our campaign without compromising privacy.
(Note: Your full street address is required on every other Letter – not going to us.)
Step 8: Visit Your MP (Optional)
You can also send a copy of your Letter to your Member of Parliament (MP). MPs are elected to represent you, provide government oversight, and can push for change. Find your MP’s contact information on the House of Commons website. Ask them to uphold the law, and support fairness & due process for Canadians who have been wrongly Denied EI Benefits due to unlawfully engineered processes.
Below are the various options you can choose from, depending on your MP…
Conservative MP (CPC)
IF you have a Conservative MP (CPC) – and are within driving distance of their Constituency Office – they have requested that you hand-deliver your Letter to them.
(They are specifically waiting for our J4EIM Letters. Hand-delivery helps process them faster.)
If you are not within a reasonable driving distance, you can mail them like the others.
You can also call their Constituency Office: Ask them to look into this ‘J4EIM’ EI Scandal.
Liberal or Other MP (LPC, NDP, Bloc)
If you do not have a Conservative MP, you have three options:
Mail it to your own MP (from any party)
Mail it to the nearest Conservative MP
Mail them to both MPs (Options 1+2)
While Liberal MPs may not choose to act on your Letter, they are still required to document that you mailed it to them – and these Letters are discoverable. (via ATIP)
Meanwhile, the Conservative Party is considering acting on these Letters, but they need to prove that there is widespread Public Interest before they can do anything.
Mailing them to your nearest CPC MP also adds your voice to the public record – when they receive enough complaints from citizens, they are required to act on them…
Contact Shadow Cabinet
Note: You can also call & email the [CPC] Shadow Cabinet – the Conservative MPs currently responsible for oversight of the Liberal Party’s federal Agencies & Programs.
Like mailing your Public Interest Letters, these actions are also permanently recorded.
(Although they do not create the same legal weight as physically mailing them – both is best.
It only takes 10-15 min to send one email and make a few quick phone calls to your MPs…)
Phone: You can call their Constituency Offices to ask them to investigate this scandal.
Email: You can email your electronic Letter to the whole Shadow Cabinet at one time.
Conservative Party: Shadow Cabinet
Parliament: List of MPs
Parliament: MP Contact Info
The relevant members of the current Shadow Cabinet include: (Contact Info Below)
Step 9: Share this with Others
You can make a real difference by sharing this simple but powerful action with others. The more letters we send, the harder it becomes for Decision‑Makers (ADMs) to ignore our collective call for Justice on this issue.
If you know someone who was denied EI or affected by the mandates, invite them to join us. Or, if you care about the future of this ‘social safety net’ program, ask others to let Canada know… (This process takes about an hour and costs less than $10 in postage.)
You can even host Public Interest Letter‑Writing Gatherings – a chance for friends, families, and community groups to print, prepare, and mail their Letters together. (Canada Post also offers discounted stamp pricing when purchased in bulk, making group participation even easier.)
These Letters form the foundation of our case. They are the single most impactful way you can help obtain Justice for all Canadians. Without them, our case will be denied in silence – just like all the previous ones – but with them, it will be difficult for ADMs to justify turning this injustice into future precedent (a legal requirement).
Mailing Addresses
#1-2. Federal Courts (FCA + SCC)
Letters #1 & #2 are identical and are mailed to both the Current and Supervisory Court.
Federal Court of Appeal: Toronto
CAS Registry: Public Interest
200–180 Queen Street W.
Toronto, ON M5V 3L6
Supreme Court of Canada
Registry: Public Interest
301 Wellington Street
Ottawa, ON K1A 0J1
#3-4. Justice Canada (AG + Litigation)
Letters #3 & #4 are identical and are mailed to both the AG and Litigation Director.
Department of Justice Canada
Office of the Attorney General
Morgan Macdougall-Milne
Litigation Director: Public Interest
284 Wellington Street
Ottawa, ON K1A 0H8
Honourable Sean Fraser
Attorney General of Canada
House of Commons
Ottawa, ON K1A 0A6
#5-7. ESDC: Employment Canada
Letters #5–#7 are identical and are mailed to the ESDC Ombuds & Privy Councillors.
ESDC: Employment Canada
Liz Smith (Deputy General)
Ombuds Office: Public Interest
140 Promenade du Portage
Gatineau, QC K1A 0J9
Honourable Patty Hajdu
Minister of Jobs & Families
House of Commons
Ottawa, ON K1A 0A6
Honourable John Zerucelli
Secretary of State: Labour
House of Commons
Ottawa, ON K1A 0A6
#8. MPs: Members of Parliament
Letter #8 usually goes to your own Member of Parliament. (Details at Step #8)
Note: There are other options in Parliament if your MP was involved in this scandal.
(Please refer to the detailed instructions at Step #8 if you believe this situation applies to you.)
Parliament: List of MPs
Parliament: MP Contact Info
#9. J4EIM: Justice 4 EI Misconduct
Letter #9 is mailed to us, so we can track how many of you joined our fight for Justice.
Note: For privacy, we don’t need your street address, but your city & postal code help.
We can use them to create interactive maps & MP Riding lists for statistical analysis.
Matthew @J4EIM
BOX 99900 (AC 231 963)
RPO NorthLand
London, ON N5V 0B3
Contact Info & Email Addresses
Note: This information is not meant to replace mailing your Public Interest Letters.
To ensure that each Letter is legally processed & documented by each Recipient, they must be physically mailed via Canada Post. (Or Hand-Delivered to MP’s Offices.)
However, if you also want to send an electronic copy – or follow-up with them to verify that your Letters were received – here is their correct contact information.
We also provide their X [Twitter] Handles, in case you want to tag them publicly.
#1-2. Federal Courts (FCA + SCC)
Template #1 (Courts) is emailed to both the Current & Supervisory Court. (FCA + SCC)
There are two email addresses for each Court: one for the Registry + one for the Court.
(Note: To save time, you can send one Letter to all four email addresses at the same time.)
(Note: Do not call the Courts to file formal complaints – you can call everyone else for this…)
Subject: ‘Public Interest Letter (re. #A-63-24)’
CAS Registry: Reception@cas-satj.gc.ca
FCA General: Information@fca-caf.ca
SCC Registry: Registry-Greffe@scc-csc.ca
SCC General: Reception@scc-csc.ca
(FCA: About the Court)
Ottawa: +1-613-996-6795
Toronto: +1-416-952-8006
X: @FedCourtApp_en
(SCC: About the Court)
General: +1-888-551-1185
#3-4. Justice Canada (AG + Litigation)
Template #2 (DOJ) is emailed to both the AG & Litigation Director at Justice Canada.
Since the Attorney General is also an MP, they have two different email addresses.
(Note: To save time, you can send one Letter to all four email addresses at the same time.)
Subject: ‘Civil Litigation: Public Interest Letter (re. FCA #A-63-24)’
General: WebAdmin@Justice.gc.ca
Minister: MCU@Justice.gc.ca
Minister: Sean.Fraser@parl.gc.ca
Litigation: AGC_PGC_Ottawa@Justice.gc.ca
(DOJ: Justice Canada)
DOJ: +1-613-957-4222 (Department)
Law: +1-613-992-4621 (Litigation)
X: @JusticeCanadaEn (DOJ)
X: @MinJusticeEn (Minister/AG)
(MP: Sean Fraser [AG])
MP: +1-613-992-6022 (Parliament)
X: @SeanFraserMP
#5-7. ESDC: Employment Canada
Template #3 (ESDC) is emailed to both the ESDC Ombuds & relevant Privy Councillors.
In addition to the ESDC Ombuds + Deputy General addresses (Liz Smith holds both roles), there are two other Ombuds that investigate complaints about ESDC programs:
The TaxPayer Ombuds (OTO) and the Public Sector Integrity Commissioner (OPSIC).
Note: If you send a single email to multiple recipients (instead of one to each), make sure you do not use ‘CC’ (Carbon Copy). Put all the addresses on the same ‘TO’ line. Most Ombuds do not act on emails when they are Copied, unless specifically asked.
Alternatively, you can include an opening line specifically asking each Ombuds to “individually investigate this situation from your own perspective, under your own laws.”
Subject: ‘Employment Canada: Public Interest Investigation (re. FCA #A-63-24)’
Minister: Patty.Hajdu@parl.gc.ca
Secretary: John.Zerucelli@parl.gc.ca
ESDC/DG: Elizabeth.Ann.Smith@hrsdc-rhdcc.gc.ca
Ombuds: EDSC.Ombuds-Ombuds.ESDC@hrsdc-rhdcc.gc.ca
OTO: OTOBOCCOMG@oto-boc.gc.ca
OPSIC: Info@psic-ispc.gc.ca
(Minister/MP: Patty Hajdu)
MP: +1-613-996-4792
X: @PattyHajdu
ESDC: DM Letter (Jobs & Roles)
(Secretary/MP: John Zerucelli)
MP: +1-613-995-4702
X: @JZerucelli
ESDC: DM Letter (Jobs & Roles)
(ESDC: About Dept.)
X: @ESDC_GC
X: @ServiceCanada_E
(ESDC: Client Satisfaction [OCS])
OCS: +1-866-506-6806
(Submit Complaint [‘Policy’])
(OPSIC: Public Integrity)
PSIC: +1-866-941-6400
X: @PS_Integrity
(Taxpayer: Ombuds)
Ombuds: +1-866-586-3839
X: @OTO_Canada
#8. MPs: Members of Parliament
Template #4 (MPs) usually goes to your own Member of Parliament. (Details at Step #8)
Note: You can also send copies to the [CPC] Shadow Cabinet – the Conservative MPs currently responsible for oversight of the Liberal Party’s federal Agencies & Programs.
Parliament: List of MPs
Parliament: MP Contact Info
Conservative Party: Shadow Cabinet
(Hon. Pierre Poilievre: Opposition Leader)
MP: Pierre.Poilievre@parl.gc.ca
Ottawa: +1-613-947-4608
Riding: +1-780-608-4600
X: @PierrePoilievre
FB: @PierrePoilievreMP
SS: @Pierre Poilievre
(Larry Brock: AG & Justice Minister)
MP: Larry.Brock@parl.gc.ca
Ottawa: +1-613-992-3118
Riding: +1-519-754-4300
X: @LarryBrockMP
FB: @LarryBrockMP
(Garnett Genuis: Employment Minister)
MP: Garnett.Genuis@parl.gc.ca
Ottawa: +1-613-995-3611
Riding: +1-780-467-4944
X: @GarnettGenuis
FB: @MPGenuis
SS: @Garnett Genuis
(Michael Barrett: Ethics & Government Accountability)
MP: Michael.Barrett@parl.gc.ca
Ottawa: +1-613-992-8756
Riding: +1-866-498-3096
X: @MikeBarrettON
FB: @MikeBarrettON
(Jasraj Hallan: Finance Minister)
MP: JasrajSingh.Hallan@parl.gc.ca
Ottawa: +1-613-947-4566
Riding: +1-403-207-3030
X: @JasrajSHallan
FB: @JasrajSHallan
(Leo Housakos: Senate Opposition Leader)
MP: Leo.Housakos@sen.parl.gc.ca
Ottawa: +1-613-947-4237
X: @SenatorHousakos
#9. J4EIM: Justice 4 EI Misconduct
Template #5 (J4EIM) is emailed to us, so we can track how many Letters were sent.
Subject: Public Interest Letters Sent (Courts, DOJ, ESDC & Parliament)
Matthew (@J4EIM)
Email: J4EIM@outlook.com
Attach your Letter + list which MPs you contacted electronically. (Phone, Email, X/FB)
(Detailed Information)
Technical Details
Close to 500k Canadians were unlawfully Denied ~$13B of Employment Insurance Benefits during the Pandemic. Why? Because they supposedly “committed Misconduct” by not consenting to sharing their private medical records or not receiving an experimental medical treatment still under Clinical Trials in 2026. 1 2 3 4
Many Employers imposed mandates using unlawful Lock-Outs by “Suspending work or Refusing to continue to employ a number of their Employees, done to compel them to agree to Terms or Conditions of Employment.” 5 (This also breaks all provincial Labour Relations Acts)
To compound this, many Employers issued Records of Employment (ROEs) with False Reason Codes [in Block 16] (‘M’ for Misconduct [Suspension or Dismissal], instead of: ‘N’ for ‘Leave of Absence’), despite clear instructions from Employment Canada (ESDC). 6 This could be a Criminal Offence: CC §398 criminalises Falsifying Employment Records ‘with intent’. 7 (Does saving up to $1M in EI Premiums count?) All ROEs are Certified [in Block 22] that “I am aware that it is an Offense to make false entries and hereby Certify that all statements on this form are True.” 8
Since 1993, Parliament has required EI Decision Makers (ADMs) to investigate whether the Employer “acted contrary to law” among other ‘Just Cause’ reasons. (EI Act §29[c][xi]) 9 This test was consistently done until 2020, 10 when any examination of “employer’s actions” or “employment contracts” suddenly became ultra vires – or [supposedly] “outside the authority” of EI ADMs. These and other similarly unjustified & unlawful excuses were dropped into prewritten Atrium ‘Decision Templates’ that were inserted into over 1,000 Decisions. 11 These Templates also cherry-picked ‘precedents’, abused legal processes, inserted logical fallacies & caused other problems that our Supreme Court calls ‘unreasonable’ in Administrative Law. (cf. Vavilov) 12
EI ADMs were given new decision-making processes – in secret – that forced them to break the EI Act by refusing to conduct this mandatory Just Cause Analysis, and were prohibited from looking at Employment Contracts. 13 (But only in some cases…)
These are just some of the 15 Errors & 12 Questions 14 we are challenging in this Judicial Review (‘JR’). If we lose this Case, these outrageous procedural abuses will become binding precedent for all EI Decisions going forward. Injustice cannot become law.
The various Parties involved in this Case need to hear from Canadians everywhere: it is unacceptable for EI Leadership to engineer new, discriminatory processes in secret, that lead EI ADMs to break the law, in order to avoid paying out Benefits to which hundreds of thousands of Canadians were legally entitled. As is using prewritten Templates that determine the Outcome in advance. However, paying everyone would have created a major crisis in EI, as that represented ~50% of the entire EI Operating Account.
Who would be blamed If EI collapsed by paying out Canadians who did not consent to the mandates? Who created and incentivised the mandates? Cui Bono?
Controlling Case Law
The Governing Case re. Public Interest Standing is ‘CCD’ (2022 SCC 27).
2022 SCC 27: British Columbia (AG) v. Council of Canadians with Disabilities (CanLII)
Although we are not ‘applying for Standing’ this Case sets out the Test for ‘Public Interest’. Our Letter should target this (‘CCD’), specifically showing how our Case:
Contains: (a) Serious Justiciable Issue
In which we all possess: (b) Genuine Interest [and]
This Case is: (c) Reasonable & Effective Means (to Obtain Justice)
Specific Paragraphs: ¶1, ¶22, ¶29-30, ¶33-35, ¶38, ¶44-46, ¶48-50, ¶52-55
Specific Contents
List Errors & Highlight Injustice (Abuse of Process & Logically-Fallacious ‘Test’; Secret BE-Memo; Atrium Decision Templates: Reverse-Engineering Decisions [Legally-Conflicting Reasons]; Censorship Attempt; CEIC Changing Facts; etc.)
Questions at Issue (e.g. #3: Employers Granting themselves the Right to Break the Law)
Importance of Rule of Law, Truth, Justice & ‘Right-to-be Heard’
Human Cost of Injustice (re. SST Stats: Efficiency & Monetary Costs: Spent $Ms fighting Unjust Issue that represented $0 Public Cost [granting prepaid EI Premiums].)
Real Danger: Enshrining Injustice as ‘Precedent’
Document Discrimination & Procedural Fairness
Call for Transparency & Accountability
(Short Instructions)
This is an important step that informs each Decision Maker (ADM) that you care about this case personally, that you are watching them, and that you encourage each one of them to make the right decision, even though it might be very difficult to do…
It is easier to make difficult decisions when we know that the people are behind us.
Open each required PIL (9x) using the specific Templates for each Recipient (5x).
a. Courts: Two Copies (Current Court: FCA + Supervisory Court: SCC)
b. Justice Canada: Two Copies (Attorney General + Litigation Director)
c. Employment Canada: Three Copies (Minister + Secretary + Ombuds)
d. Your MP: One Copy [or More] (Your own Member[s] of Parliament)
e. J4EIM (Us): One Copy (This allows us to track & prove you sent them)
Make any desired changes, or print them out ‘as is’ if already satisfied with them.
Mark each of the two available options if applicable: #MeToo + Personal Impact.
Print out corresponding #of ‘Personal Impact’ Letters. (Edit it first if desired)
Each Impact Letter is identical: this step is only done once, but printed several times.Verify each letter is complete & correct, then Sign each one with a coloured pen.
Carefully label each envelope using the correct recipient & return addresses.
(You can skip the Return Address on our copy for privacy reasons if that’s a concern.)Purchase five stamps for the non-Parliament recipients: (Courts, DOJ, ESDC, Us)
(2x Courts: FCA & SCC, 1x DOJ: Litigation Director, 1x ESDC: Ombuds, 1x: J4EIM)Bring them all to a Canada Post Office, Depot, or nearby Drop-Box Mailbox.
[Optional] Call + Email electronic copies of each Letter to each Agency…
(It is important to mail each primary letter using Canada Post, not just send emails. This obligates them to document, process & file each one in their various internal systems.
NB: Do not call the Courts to register formal complaints – only to verify receipt of PILs.)
Template: Personal Impact Statement (Attachment)
This is our template for Personal Impact Statements. Each PIL ends with two options:
◯ My Own EI Case was affected by this Engineering.
◯ See Attachment: My Personal Impact Statement.
Mark the first option if you were also Denied EI for ‘Mandate Misconduct’ Reasons.
Select the second option if you want to expand & share your own story with them.
The Personal Impact Statement addendum contains two pages you can use: (either/both)
#1: 14 Common Errors: Options to select the 14 most-common ‘C19-MM’ problems.
#2: Personal Impact Header: Space to write your own story, in your own words.
These letters are going to 4 entities: Courts, DOJ, ESDC & Parl. – all of whom have key roles to play in exposing what happened and reforming EI Adjudication going forward.
Sharing your own story – in your own words – can have tremendous impact. If you do not wish to share any details, just use the first page and select all that applied to you…
( Word: https://Justice4EIMisconduct.com/assets/Public-Interest/J4EIM-Impact-Letter.docx )
( PDF: https://Justice4EIMisconduct.com/assets/Public-Interest/J4EIM-Impact-Letter.pdf )
Templates: Specific Recipients
Template #1 is sent to all four relevant Court email addresses together at one time.
( Word: https://Justice4EIMisconduct.com/assets/Public-Interest/J4EIM-Interest-Court.docx )
( PDF: https://Justice4EIMisconduct.com/assets/Public-Interest/J4EIM-Interest-Court.pdf )
Template #2 can be sent to all four relevant DOJ email addresses together at one time.
( Word: https://Justice4EIMisconduct.com/assets/Public-Interest/J4EIM-Interest-DOJ.docx )
( PDF: https://Justice4EIMisconduct.com/assets/Public-Interest/J4EIM-Interest-DOJ.pdf )
Template #3 is sent to all six Employment-related email addresses simultaneously…
( Word: https://Justice4EIMisconduct.com/assets/Public-Interest/J4EIM-Interest-ESDC.docx )
( PDF: https://Justice4EIMisconduct.com/assets/Public-Interest/J4EIM-Interest-ESDC.pdf )
Template #4 is sent to all relevant Parliament-related email addresses simultaneously…
( Word: https://Justice4EIMisconduct.com/assets/Public-Interest/J4EIM-Interest-MP.docx )
( PDF: https://Justice4EIMisconduct.com/assets/Public-Interest/J4EIM-Interest-MP.pdf )
Template #5 is sent to us: we track how many unique emails we receive from everyone.
We enjoy personalised messages of encouragement – and hearing your own story…
( Word: https://Justice4EIMisconduct.com/assets/Public-Interest/J4EIM-Interest-Letter.docx )
( PDF: https://Justice4EIMisconduct.com/assets/Public-Interest/J4EIM-Interest-Letter.pdf )
Template: Baseline Letter (For Personalisation)
This is our baseline template for those wanting to build their own ‘PIL’ Letter. We already provided completed letters for each specific recipient Agency up above…
(NB: We include both MS Word & PDF versions of each document for flexibility.)
( Word: https://Justice4EIMisconduct.com/assets/Public-Interest/(Public-Interest-Base).docx )
( PDF: https://Justice4EIMisconduct.com/assets/Public-Interest/(Public-Interest-Base).pdf )
Public Interaction (Comments)
Provide your thoughts – and any #MeToo situations, specifically listing the Errors that applied in your own Cases… (Full List in Home Page)
[NCT04702945] Canada’s largest 200,000 person Clinical Trial (‘Canadian COVID-19 Emergency Department Registry’ [‘CCEDRRN’]), still has not submitted any results by Jan. 2026, despite ‘estimating’ that they would ‘complete’ our benchmark study by Dec. 2023.
They have not provided a single status update to explain their multi-year delay. Why‽
Source: https://ClinicalTrials.gov/study/NCT04702945
[NCT04368728] Pfizer’s own 47,000 person Clinical Trial is still incomplete in Jan. 2026. Despite claiming to ‘complete’ this study in Feb. 2023, they did not start submitting results until Feb. 2024.
As of Jan. 2026, all five attempts to submit results failed Quality Control because key information is missing, invalid, without explanation, and other basic errors.
Source: https://ClinicalTrials.gov/study/NCT04368728
[NCT04834869] The 30,000 person ‘CoVaST’ Clinical Trial (‘COVID-19 Vaccines Safety Tracking’) is attempting “to evaluate the long-term consequences of COVID-19 vaccines” across 10 different products. Their Canadian location is run at McMaster University in Hamilton, ON. Their ‘Actual Start Date’ was Apr. 2021 and their ‘Estimated Completion Date’ is Dec. 2026.
To date, they have not yet ‘recruited’ any Canadian test subjects. Only 6 / 14 locations have recruited anyone worldwide.
Source: https://ClinicalTrials.gov/study/NCT04834869
[ClinicalTrials.gov] As of Jan. 2026, there are 51 Canadian Clinical Trials listed for ‘COVID-19 Vaccines’. Only 4 / 51 (7.8%) are ‘Complete with Results’ that pass Quality Control. Half of them are for specialty products not currently approved and distributed by Health Canada. (PTX-COVID19-B and VBI-2902a)
[NCT04796896] ModernaTX: Safety Study in Healthy Children (6 mo. to 12 yrs.) [~12k Children]
[NCT05022329] Pfizer & Moderna: COVID-19 Vaccine Boosters in Patients with CKD (Chronic Kidney Disease) [273 CKD Patients]
[CLC §3] Canada Labour Code, §3(1) [‘Interpretation’]:
LockOut: “includes the closing of a place of employment, a suspension of work by an employer, or a refusal by an employer to continue to employ a number of their employees, done to compel their employees […] to agree to terms or conditions of employment.”
Source: https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/l-2/section-3.html#339540
ESDC: Records of Employment during COVID-19: Vaccination
“When the employee doesn't report to work because they refuse to comply with your mandatory COVID-19 vaccination policy, use [] Code ‘N’ (Leave of Absence).”
Source: [Archive: 2024-11-08] https://web.archive.org/web/20241126215225/https://www.canada.ca/en/employment-social-development/programs/ei/ei-list/ei-employers.html#h2.02.h3.1
[CC §398] Criminal Code, §398 [‘Falsifying Employment Record’]
“Every one who, with intent to deceive, falsifies an employment record by any means […] is guilty of an Offence punishable on summary conviction.”
Source: https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-46/section-398.html
[ROE Block 22] “I am aware that it is an Offense to make false entries and hereby Certify that all statements on this form are True.”
[EIA §29(c)] Employment Insurance Act, §29(c) [‘Just Cause’]
“Just Cause for voluntarily leaving an employment or taking leave from an employment exists if the claimant had no reasonable alternative to leaving or taking leave, having regard to all the circumstances, including any of the following:”
(xi) practices of an employer that are contrary to law
(vii) significant modification of terms and conditions respecting wages or salary
(ix) significant changes in work duties
(xiii) undue pressure by an employer on the claimant to leave their employment
Source: https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/ENG/ACTS/E-5.6/section-29.html
[SST Decisions: Query] ‘Just Cause’ Analysis was done 540 times in the 6 years before the pandemic (2014-19). It was understood that Disentitling Claimants required this test.
Hypocritically, ‘Contrary to Law’ Analysis was done when Claimants complained about ‘feeling unsafe’ because their employer did not force their coworkers to wear COVID-19 Masks at all times. They were given EI Benefits for this reason. (Example) However, Claimants who did not wear masks themselves were Denied EI. (Example)
[J4EIM: Errors #14-15] Atrium Decision Templates Reverse-Engineer Decisions.
Source: https://blog.justice4eimisconduct.com/p/14-templates
[2019 SCC 65] Canada (Minister of Citizenship & Immigration) v. Vavilov
Source: https://canlii.ca/t/j46kb
[J4EIM: Error #12] Internal ‘BE-Memo (2021-10)’ Usurps Law.
[J4EIM: Key Questions] Memorandum: 12 Points at Issue
Source: https://blog.justice4eimisconduct.com/p/key-questions
Thanks for your efforts!
The procedural fairness angle is what stands out most here. When adjudication templates and reverse-engineered decisions become standard practice, it fundamentally undermines the right to be heard. I've seen similar issues where administrative bodies prioritize efficiency over individualized review, and the human cost is real. The Secret BE-Memo detail is concerning - if internal guidance directly conflicts with statutory requirements, thatcreates a legitimacy crisis. Documenting these patterns through public interest letters might actually build the record needed forappeal.